In the world of digital photography, “Megapixels” has long been the primary metric used to sell cameras. It’s a number that feels easy to understand: bigger must be better, right? However, for the vast majority of photographers—from hobbyists to working professionals—the obsession with high pixel counts is often a distraction from what actually makes an image look great, and it is one that marketing thrives on.
Here is the reality of how we consume media today and why those massive files might just be taking up space on your hard drive.
The Screen Reality: 4K is Smaller Than You Think
We often view our best work on high-end monitors or televisions, assuming these devices require massive resolution to look sharp. In reality, the hardware we use to view digital images is significantly lower in resolution than even an entry-level camera from ten years ago.
- 1080p (Full HD): This standard screen resolution is only 2.1 megapixels. If you are shooting with a 24MP camera, your screen is discarding over 90% of your image data just to display it.
- 4K Ultra HD: Even on a massive 4K display, you are only seeing 8.3 megapixels. Just think about that for a second!
If you own a 45MP or 60MP camera, you could crop away nearly 80% of your photo and still fill every single pixel on a 4K monitor. Unless you are constantly “pixel peeping” (zooming in to 100%-400% to look at individual eyelashes), you simply aren’t seeing the extra resolution you paid for. End of story!
The Printing Power of 9 Megapixels
Let us assume that you have cropped an image down to only 9 megapixels. A common argument for high megapixels is the ability to print large. While more pixels do provide more detail for massive gallery wraps, the “Viewing Distance Rule” changes the math entirely.
When we look at a print, we don’t press our noses against the paper. As the print gets larger, we naturally step back to take it all in. This allows lower-resolution files to look incredibly sharp.
How large can you go with just 9MP?
I’ve chosen 9mp as an rough guideline to a finished, and cropped image as an example. A 9-megapixel image (roughly 3500 \times 2500 pixels) is surprisingly versatile:
At 300 DPI, you’ll get magazine quality 8″ x 10″ printing, more than enough for any magazine or book that you are having printed. At 250 DPI you can have 11″ x 14″ images for hanging on your walls, and at 175 DPI you can easily have 16″ x 20″ images that look good at standard viewing distances for photos (approx 3-foot).
At 100 DPI you can have wall art printed at a huge 24″ x 36″, and because your eyes cannot resolve fine details from several feet away, a 9MP image printed as a large poster can look indistinguishable from a 50MP image to the average viewer standing in a living room.
What Actually Matters?
If megapixels aren’t the priority, what is? If you stop worrying about resolution, you can focus on the factors that truly impact image quality:
- Dynamic Range: The ability to capture detail in both deep shadows and bright highlights.
- Low Light Performance: Larger pixels (found on sensors with lower megapixel counts) often handle noise much better than “crowded” high-megapixel sensors.
- Lens Quality: A 60MP sensor will only highlight the flaws in a mediocre lens. A sharp lens on a 12MP sensor will almost always look better than a soft lens on a 45MP sensor.
- Storage & Speed: High-megapixel files slow down your computer, fill up your cloud storage, and make your camera’s buffer fill up faster.
Summary
Megapixels are a tool for cropping (so ideal for wildlife photographers and people who constantly need to crop and specialised large-scale printing (like billboards or fine-art galleries). For everyone else, anything over 12 to 20 megapixels is largely “invisible” detail. Next time you’re looking at a new camera, look at the autofocus system, the colour science, or the ergonomics instead—those are the things you’ll actually notice in your final photos.
Many people won’t admit to being sold megapixels as a marketing gimmick, and that is fine. If it makes some photographers feel better, then so-be-it.
This has been Part 9 of a 12 part series for “12 Days Of Christmas 2025”. A collection of new articles and so much more from Mark G Adams from One Camera One Lens Photography as well as guest authors. Catch them all if you missed any here.

I think this is an article many people actually need to read, especially those who still believe high megapixel counts are a must.
The points are well argued and technically sound, and they line up perfectly with real-world use rather than marketing. This is also exactly why Micro Four Thirds has deliberately stayed around the 20MP mark, not because it “can’t do more,” but because it’s a conscious and well-balanced compromise.
Excellent article. So far, this is easily my favourite one.
Have a great Sunday !
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Marc. I know it’ll ruffle a few feathers with some, but the truth always does! Thank you for enjoying it, and enjoy your Sunday too.
LikeLiked by 1 person
An excellent summation on the subject Mark. I have some images taken on an old Sony Mavica (maybe 1.1 MP that are stunning and some images on my 24MP camera that are meh. There is a lot more that goes into a good camera and a good photo. Cheers. Allan
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you Allan 🙏
LikeLiked by 1 person