Fujifilm’s most underrated lens

Fujifilm release some amazing lenses. In fact, there is not really a lens that is not capable, or not sharp enough to please even the most toughest critics. However, because Fujifilm have an XF range and an XC range, targeting quality build and higher price over lower price and a not so good build quality (compared to the XF premium lenses), some Fujifilm users dismiss the XC series of lenses outright. But among them all, there’s a hidden gem that every Fujifilm user should use.

An introduction into XF versus XC lenses

Different people have different budgets, and so Fujifilm caters for these markets having two different lens formats.

The XF lenses are the most expensive, being usually better made than the XC lenses, with metal mounts, usually an aperture ring (the XF 27mm F/2.8 version 1 doesn’t have an aperture ring), sometimes weather resistant (signified by a WR) and glass coated with slightly different optical coatings.

The XC lenses generally miss out on most of these, and they never have an aperture ring (and so must be controlled by one of your dial’s). Also they are considerably less expensive than their XF counterparts, making them ideal for those on a budget.

In terms of the quality of image, the XC lenses usually have more than acceptable sharpness, but the savings in price usually means that the lens aperture range is not as good as it’s XF counterparts, and thus suited more for daylight shooting.

Fujifilm’s most underrated lens

There’s no surprise that Fujifilms most underrated lens an XC lens, the Fuji XC50-230mm F/4.5-6.7 OIS II. A lightweight, telephoto lens, made of plastic with no aperture ring. As you can see by the introductory photograph, it’s a small lens!

Taking a look at this lens in more detail, it has a focal range 35mm equivalent of 76mm-350mm, is 111mm-177mm in length, has a minimum focus distance of 1.1 metres and 3.5 stops of image stabilisation.

What makes it so great are a number of factors.

1. Lightweight and small.
2. Pretty fast autofocus to capture birds in flight and aircraft (when used in my case on an X-T3 and an X-T20).
3. Great sharpness wide open and even better stopped down slightly for excellent image quality.

This lens is not the fastest lens when it comes to its aperture, so don’t expect a really shallow depth of field on more distant objects, or expect to use it without cracking up the ISO or using a tripod in lower light.

Thankfully, most Fujifilm cameras tend to be very good at higher ISO values, so you can still use this lens handheld during dying light when shooting wide open and trusting that the ISO will be acceptable

Over the years I’ve had some amazing photographs with the 50-230mm, in all weathers. It may not be weather resistant, but like all camera equipment, it won’t die if it gets a little wet and you make sure you dry it off as soon as you can.

Here are some example images taken with the XC50-230mm. All images can be viewed full screen, and full EXIF data is included. Also visit the latest Photographing Birds In Flight article to see the lens put through it’s paces.


It’s cheap, it’s affordable, it’s light and most importantly, it’s reliable. I’ve just given a few examples of objects that might test the lens, although mostly taken at 230mm, there are some around 50mm and 120mm.

The XC50-230mm is my favourite zoom lens that can be taken anywhere, and which takes little room in the camera bag. It’s output is excellent and I will add raw files in the coming days for you to examine. At the price it is, especially second hand, don’t hesitate! Just buy it!

If you’re a Fujifilm fan, join our new community on Facebook now for much more!

Published by Mark G.Adams

Fujifilm And Olympus Documentary Photographer, YouTuber & Blogger.

14 thoughts on “Fujifilm’s most underrated lens

  1. Well written review, beautiful pictures. Together with the 15-45mm and this 50-230mm, you have two lenses that have a great range, and you really don’t need more. The pictures certainly prove that. I myself have the 15-45mm and the 18-135mm, and I have sometimes regretted the latter. It is a great lens, but not only is it terribly expensive, but the range is in many cases just inadequate. The better buy would undoubtedly have been this 50-230mm, but as you write, you can indeed sometimes find them very cheaply second-hand. So …

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Also, thank you for this post. I had the 55 -200 for a while and returned it. It was a good lens but not enough reach for me for the price. I might now get this one since it offers that midrange without the price tag. Thanks!

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I have this lens and really like it for all the reasons you mentioned. No aperture ring, so what; use a dial (which I prefer now). Plastic barrel, plastic mount? Again, so what. If you drop a metal zoom, it’ll cost you more to repair than this lens. As for the plastic mount, how many thousand mountings will it last? How many will you do? The optics of this lens are great — as your samples show. Ditto, AF and OIS. I’d rather carry a (in bag or mounted) a lens that I’ll use than a lens I leave behind because it’s too heavy.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: