In the age of digital photography, we’ve become accustomed to an almost obsessive focus on technical specifications. Photographers, aspiring and professional alike, pore over sensor sizes, lens charts, and, perhaps most persistently, EXIF data. This embedded information, detailing everything from aperture and shutter speed to ISO and white balance, is often seen as a holy grail, a direct window into the mind and methods of the photographer. Many platforms even proudly display this data alongside images, assuming it offers invaluable insight. It is something that I try and avoid and something I explain to others when they ask me about sharing that information.
Critical examination of sharing this data reveals a surprising truth: for the vast majority of viewers, and often even for fellow photographers, the readily displayed EXIF data regarding aperture, shutter speed, and ISO is not only not useful, but can actually be a distraction, misleading, or even counterproductive to appreciating the image itself. I understand that some people like to see it, so I’ll explain why it may be good as a ballpark figure, but it is generally useless information.
Let’s dissect why this seemingly helpful data frequently misses the mark.
1. The “Recipe” Fallacy: Photography Isn’t Baking
The primary reason EXIF data is often sought is the belief that it provides a “recipe” for replicating a shot or understanding its creation. The thinking goes: “If I know their aperture, I can achieve that bokeh!” or “Their shutter speed tells me how they froze the action.”
This is fundamentally flawed. Photography, unlike baking, is rarely a precise, repeatable science. A beautiful image is a confluence of countless variables, only a fraction of which are captured by aperture, shutter speed, and ISO:
- Light Quality and Direction: This is arguably the single most important factor, yet it’s entirely absent from basic EXIF displays. The soft glow of golden hour light demands different settings than harsh midday sun, regardless of the subject.
- Lens Choice and Focal Length: While a lens might be identified, the specific focal length used (especially with zooms) and its inherent characteristics (e.g., lens compression at long focal lengths) are crucial to the final look.
- Composition and Perspective: The angle, distance from the subject, and arrangement of elements within the frame are paramount to the image’s impact.
- Post-Processing: This is the elephant in the room. Modern digital photography is a two-stage process: capture and edit. The vast majority of professional-looking images undergo significant post-processing – colour grading, dodging and burning, sharpening, noise reduction, and more. The “look” of an image is often more a result of post-production than initial camera settings.
- Subject and Scene Dynamics: A portrait with a shallow depth of field is vastly different from a landscape requiring deep focus. The optimal settings are entirely dependent on what’s being photographed and the desired outcome.
- Photographer’s Vision: Ultimately, a photograph is an artistic expression. The choices made are subjective, driven by an aesthetic goal that cannot be distilled into three technical numbers.
Knowing the f-stop of a stunning portrait tells you nothing about the quality of light, the model’s expression, the composition, or the meticulous retouching that brought it to life. It’s like knowing a chef used salt in a dish without knowing anything else about the ingredients or cooking method.
2. Context is King (and EXIF Lacks It)
EXIF data is presented in a vacuum. A high ISO might suggest a low-light scenario, but it doesn’t tell you how low the light was, what the photographer was trying to achieve (e.g., intentionally grainy for effect), or if they were hand-holding a heavy lens in a precarious position.
Consider two photographers taking a picture of the same subject at the same time:
Photographer A: Using a fast prime lens (e.g., f/1.4), they might use a lower ISO and faster shutter speed.
Photographer B: Using a slower zoom lens (e.g., f/4), they might be forced to use a higher ISO and/or slower shutter speed to achieve a similar exposure.
The EXIF data would be vastly different, yet both could produce equally compelling images. The why behind the settings is far more important than the numbers themselves, and that “why” is almost never conveyed by simple EXIF display.
3. Fostering Technical Myopia, Not Artistic Appreciation
When EXIF data is prominently displayed, it inadvertently encourages viewers (especially beginners) to focus on the technical rather than the artistic. Instead of asking, “What emotions does this image evoke?” or “How did the photographer use light so beautifully?”, they ask, “What aperture did they use to get that bokeh?”
This shifts the focus from the subjective, creative aspects of photography to a checklist of technical settings. It implies that good photography is about using the “right” numbers, rather than seeing, composing, and creating. This can stifle artistic development, as aspiring photographers become obsessed with imitating settings rather than developing their own vision and understanding of light.
4. Overwhelm and Irrelevance for the Non-Photographer
For the vast majority of people looking at an image – those who aren’t photographers themselves – aperture, shutter speed, and ISO are meaningless numbers. They want to be moved, informed, or entertained by the image. Displaying “f/2.8, 1/250s, ISO 400” is akin to showing the technical specifications of the canvas and brush sizes used by a painter; it’s irrelevant to appreciating the painting itself. It adds clutter without adding value.
5. The Deception of the “Perfect Setting”
There are no universally “perfect” settings. The optimal aperture, shutter speed, and ISO are constantly changing depending on the scene, light, desired effect, and even the camera equipment being used. Seeing an f/1.8 on a stunning portrait might lead a beginner to believe f/1.8 is always the answer for portraits, when in reality, f/4 might be more appropriate for a group shot, or f/11 for a deeply textured environmental portrait.
This can create false expectations and lead to frustration when attempts to replicate a look based solely on EXIF data fail.
Conclusion: Focus on the Art, Not the Numbers
While EXIF data can be a useful diagnostic tool for a photographer reviewing their own work, or for a very specific technical query between seasoned professionals, its public display alongside an image often serves no practical purpose for appreciating the photograph itself.
By stripping away the technical clutter, we allow the image to speak for itself, fostering a deeper, more meaningful appreciation for the art of photography, rather than getting lost in the illusion of insight provided by a few numbers. The truly great images transcend their technical origins; they resonate because of what they show and feel, not because of the f-stop used to capture them.
My name is Mark G Adams and I run Photography By Mark G Adams. I am a professional photographer from South Wales, shooting weddings, events and portraits as well as running meets and workshops. For fun I like to shoot landscapes, wildlife and occasionally do street photography. Enjoy my website as I share my knowledge learned over decades of working and having fun in photography.
You can find all the latest articles and blogs on my homepage here.
My main photography social media page is my Photography By Mark G Adams page.
Nikon Recipes for the Z system can be found here.
You can find a complete list of my gear here.
One Camera One Lens Photography 